1) Who do we propose and why? 2) The diagnosis of the present state of the Church
3) What is the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate (BCP)?
Ad 1) Who do we propose and why?
The destructive activity of the heretic Bergoglio reaches its peak. This year, another nail is to be driven in the coffin by the so-called Amazon Synod. Therefore, in this critical situation, the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate proposes that the brave orthodox bishops and cardinals elect a legitimate and true Catholic Pope in an extraordinary election! Specifically, the Patriarchate proposes Archbp. Carlo Maria Viganò. The reason is that he is a moral and orthodox personality. In addition, he stood up as a hero against the entire system of the homosexual network in the highest places in the Church. He called for the abdication of the manifest heretic Bergoglio in order to initiate the process of restoration of the Church. However, he still has to hide from Bergoglio’s mafia. Archbp. Viganò is well acquainted with the circumstances within the Catholic Church as well as with the state of the highest church hierarchy.
If, for certain reasons, he refuses to accept the papal office, let him choose a suitable candidate for the papacy.
Ad 2) The diagnosis of the present state of the Church
Today, Bergoglio destroys the Church on a massive scale. But this process has its deep root, namely the Second Vatican Council! Unless this fact is truthfully exposed, it is not possible to show adequate repentance or to start the restoration of the Church. The spiritual change through the Council was programmed by John XXIII, who was a supporter of the heresy of Modernism. He empowered liberal theologians and bishops to play a key role at the Council. Under the slogan ‘aggiornamento’, the Church was opened to the spirit of the world and the Holy Spirit was gradually expelled. That period was marked by the spread of the heresies of neo-Modernism, and therefore the Council was primarily obliged to call them by their proper names and to condemn them. But it did the exact opposite! By its silence, it opened the door for their invasion of all theological schools and thus of the whole Church.
Another crime of the Council is that it introduced the heresy of syncretism with paganism in Nostra Aetate.
As for the changes in the Liturgy, they did not lead to a deeper experience of the mystery of faith, but time showed the opposite. Although the Council’s various documents also contained neutral wording, it changes nothing about the fact that that the Council, as a whole, was heretical.
The implementation of Vatican II’s heresy of syncretism culminated through John Paul II at the meeting in Assisi in 1986. Moreover, in the new Code, John Paul II abolished the penalty of excommunication against Freemasons, thus opening the door for them to the Vatican. He also obliged all bishops by a papal document to cover up the sexual abuse of minors. He is therefore guilty not only of the spread of heresies but also of the spread of an amoral infection. His beatification and canonization is invalid!
Benedict XVI did not use his authority to condemn ex cathedra the heresies of neo-Modernism or syncretism. The Bishops’ Synod of the UO GCC, which subsequently established a Patriarchate, wrote more than ten open letters to Benedict XVI at the time, warning him against beatification. For the same reason, when the danger of apostasy culminated, on April 5, 2011 the seven bishops of the UO GCC established the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate. Its purpose is to defend the doctrine of faith and morals in the Church. We sent the Charter to Benedict XVI before May 1, 2011.
By beatifying John Paul II, Benedict XVI beatified the heretical system along with the apostate gesture in Assisi and brought a curse – anathema – both on himself and on the Church acc. Gal 1:8-9. On the same day, May 1, 2011, the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate made this anathema against Benedict XVI and John Paul II public. Since then, the Church has been in a state of Sede Vacante.
Thereafter, the Patriarchate appealed to Benedict XVI to resign from his office which he already occupied illegitimately. Eventually he did so; however, he did not repent and his resignation was exploited by the antichristian system for the election of the archheretic Bergoglio.
It can be assumed that after an extraordinary election of a valid Pope, Bergoglio will not resign. If he did resign or die, the heretics would elect another heretic. However, this will no longer be the Church of Christ but the Church of Antichrist, the Church of the New Age, which will create unity even with pagans who worship demons. This is what Bergoglio is heading for in the Amazon Synod as well as by the promotion of Islamization and homosexualism and by his denial of the existence of universally valid moral standards in Amoris Laetitia.
0 Comments